Welcome back to Counting to 5, a podcast about the United States Supreme Court.
In this episode, I explain the Court’s new decisions in five argued cases, including Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, the case about the legality of Ohio’s process for removing names from the voting rolls.
Show Notes
Correction:
Toward the end of this episode, I stated that the Chief Justice appoints judges to the Judicial Conference of the United States. This was an error. The Judicial Conference is actually composed of the Chief Judge of each Circuit Court of Appeals and a District Court elected by the judges of each circuit.
News and Developments:
Washington v. United States:
Justices’ Financial Disclosure Reports:
Opinions in Argued Cases:
China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh:
Oral Argument: Transcript Audio
Sveen v. Melin:
Oral Argument: Transcript Audio
Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute:
Oral Argument: Transcript Audio
Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.:
Oral Argument: Transcript Audio
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky:
Oral Argument: Transcript Audio
Next Livestream:
June 21, 2018, 9:00 pm ET: YouTube Link
Counting to 5:
Show Notes: Countingto5.com
Facebook: Facebook.com/Countingto5
Twitter: @Countingto5
Email: mike@countingto5.com
Voicemail: 774-2-COUNT-5 (774-226-8685)
Patreon: patreon.com/countingto5
iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/counting-to-5/id1164291244
TuneIn: https://tunein.com/podcasts/Politics/Counting-to-5-p1124372/
Stitcher: stitcher.com/podcast/counting-to-5